AFLD2 Dr. Simone Gold

Back to Transcripts Home & other posts Immunity

A talk on Covid vaccines, including the AFLD’s recommendations, and on HCQ. Includes the LancetGate story.

Dr. Simone Gold, of
US Location unknown, probably a church. Date unknown late 2020
Original sources of video:
Transcript has some editing and may contain errors. There may be more recent info on the afld website.

Thank you so much for inviting me I come to you tonight with a lot of information about the experimental vaccines What’s called the experimental vaccines regarding covid-19. I think all of this information will be brand-new to you. I know that this was all brand new to me over the last few months. Even as a board-certified Emergency Physician. I did not know a lot of what I’m about to share with you, on behalf of America’s Front Line Doctors, which is a volunteer physician organization that we started specifically to combat this serious and life-threatening disinformation campaign that has really taken over America. And really the entire Globe. It is very very scary stuff. I’ve been a doctor for a long time. Before me, my father was a doctor. I’ve never seen anything like this, where we have groups of physicians or scientists and government bureaucrat agencies essentially lying to the American people and people across the world. I have many, many examples.
One I’ll give you is that the National Institute of Health right now has as its policy recommendation for patients with covid-19 stating that unless you’re in the hospital requiring oxygen, there’s no actual treatment available for you. That is a complete falsehood. Completely false. In most of the non First World countries, there’s plenty of treatment easily available. Hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin. Here in America, if you can find a doctor to prescribe it you get those medicines or budesonide. There’s many options.
This disinformation is why we came public. When we started to speak out around July or a little bit sooner, but we got a lot of attention starting in July. We were promptly de-platformed. It doesn’t bother me so much – I know the information.
It bothers me tremendously on behalf of all of humanity, right? This is a crime against humanity. There’s a physician in the Netherlands. He’s bringing a lawsuit in The Hague it calling it that – a crime against humanity.
There was a lot of information you haven’t heard. There was a senate testimony about a month ago. A bunch of doctors went and testified. I believe it was Senator Johnson as the chairman. You can find it on our website The doctors testified that the vast majority of deaths in America would not have not ever happened.
I start with that, because when you understand you must understand the magnitude of a lie to understand what they’re trying to tell you about these experimental vaccines. So we need to just kind of go through that for a little bit. The disinformation was apparent since the beginning.
We call this illness covid-19, but it’s real name should be after the location from where it arose which is Wuhan China and if you remember it was called the Wuhan virus for awhile, a month or so before we discovered the Chinese Communist Party didn’t like that name. They set about putting a lot of pressure on media and on politicians to change it. They started calling it the coronavirus because it is actually a coronavirus, but that became very confusing to doctors and scientists because there are seven coronaviruses. This is just number 7.
So we used to used the word coronavirus sometimes on our charts when we met a common cold, you know person will come into the ER in my case and they just had a common cold and I would sometimes write coronavirus on the chart as the diagnosis. So it was pretty confusing for doctors & scientists to call it the coronavirus right? So they had to change the name again and it became known by its acronym coronavirus disease 2019 covid-19.
I have to start there because it was never a racist or or weird thing to call it though Wuhan virus, right?
There’s so many diseases that are named after the location from which they arise there. Zika. Ebola. There’s Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, Lyme disease. I mean, the list is endless German Measles, Spanish flu. So the deception was there from the very beginning?So that was the first big lie.
The next big popular well-known line
was the maligning of this common ordinary, cheap, safe medication called hydroxychloroquine. Those of you have traveled abroad who’ve taken mission trips, for example, or anybody in the military are quite familiar with this drug. Doctors would just give it out like handy. I was going I need a holiday to Africa about 20 years ago and I was a medical student at the time and they just handed me the pills. Here you go. I never asked any questions. It was a big fat nothing taking hydroxychloroquine.
All of a sudden we doctors started hearing that hydroxychloroquine is unsafe. You can’t understand what’s going on with the lies until you understand what an enormous lie this is.
Hydroxychloroquine is over the counter in much of the world.
It is taken in many African nations. They call it Sunday Sunday medicine – you take it every Sunday. People keep it in the pocket the way Americans might keep Tylenol. It’s is absolutely ordinary stuff. It was over the counter. …
Really in any country that had malaria, or any country that had citizens that would visit malaria countries on holiday
it was over the counter. For example, it is over-the-counter in France. The only reason it wasn’t over the counter in America is there just wasn’t a consumer demand. In America, we use hydroxychloroquine for two main reasons, lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, and also for malaria for people going on holiday, but generally it’s lupus and rheumatoid arthritis. For those illnesses, patients regularly see physicians
so they can get a prescription for it. That’s why it was never over the counter here, not because it’s unsafe. It’s been FDA approved for five years. We give it to babies. We give it to children. We give it to pregnant women. We give it to nursing mothers. We give it to the elderly and give it to the immune compromised. Those last two categories to take this medication for decades.
There was never a pretense that it’s not safe. That’s the drug that you’ve been hearing about for nine months now 10 months they’re telling you is unsafe. It’s an incredible lie of incredible proportions. Once you understand that, you will be suspicious of everything that follows. So that’s where I found myself. I was in the emergency department treating patients as they came in with covid-19. And once we had the rapid test so I can confirm the diagnosis, my first patient, who I needed to give hydroxychloroquine and zinc to, I did it and even knowing the kind of the controversy, I really didn’t think twice about it. I don’t know. It was fine. I gave it to her. I actually called her the next day. She was so much better. She herself got better within about 12 hours. In about 48 Hours she was essentially completely well.
this completely matched what I had read in the scientific literature. I knew many doctors were [had?] done. They said, and many journal articles seems it was completely consistent.
What was really shocking and completely inconsistent was my medical director who calls me the next day and threatens to fire me for doing this this treatment. Even as I describe this moment to you, it’s shocking to me. I remember the case the situation, the conversation and he’s saying he’s going to a fireman I said, why would you fire me over this? Well, I don’t think it works. I said, well then don’t prescribe it. You don’t know the science the way I have. I know it works. You’ll change your mind in a couple of months when, you know, you get a little wiser.
But why would you get involved with me treating a patient? You do your thing. I do my thing. That’s how medicine is practiced. We are licensed as individuals. It’s actually against the law to have what’s called a corporate practice of medicine where the corporation practices for you. It has to be the individual doctor/ physician. That’s why patients go to multiple doctors, right?
The almost worst part of the conversation was not even that he was ignorant that the drug worked,
but his reasons for saying that he was going to fire me if I did this, and the reason, which he put in writing because he wasn’t so smart. He said it was because the biggest payer at that hospital, which is a large insurance company that everyone here has heard of that’s back on the west coast mainly, didn’t want us to prescribe it. They were blocking it so that payer insurance company was pressuring the hospital that their doctors shouldn’t do it.
It had nothing to do with even if he thought it was good or bad for the patient. It had to do with money and payment… I honestly still can’t believe I’m relating this story. It was really unbelievable.
So he said I could never do that again. I said, well, good luck with that. So so it kept happening and happened about four or five times and I kind of knew that my days at that particular hospital were going to be numbered, right? I mean, how long is this going to last?
So I started looking online for other physicians like myself. I knew I couldn’t be the only one and I found the most amazing group of doctors -really just brilliant, intelligent, compassionate, kind, and and we got together, and we called ourselves the Americas Frontline doctors We needed to break this disinformation cycle.
So I set out to do something called The White Coat Summit, [see the other AFLD transcript] an entire day of education. We brought
doctors and we brought social media influencers – young people know them as Youtubers. We brought them to Washington. We did seven hours of education, we laid out all the facts, you know, very dispassionate.
Here’s the facts that hydroxychloroquine. Here’s the facts on lock down. Here’s the facts on masks. Here’s the facts on schools and kids transmission. Here’s the facts for the elderly. Here’s the facts on other treatments other than hydroxychloroquine, and we did that. In the middle of that day, we took a break and we walked over to the Supreme Court. That was the video about 20 million views. It gets 20 million views not because I can sing like Beyonce. But because human beings recognize truth, we have something inside of us.
I really emphasize that point because you can’t get to 20 million views. Nobody plans that you think it’s only if people say, oh my gosh, you got to listen to this gotta listen to this you recognize the truth. You recognize the truth. So I guess after a while Big Tech, you know caught up with the fact that this was like breaking the internet. So, within an hour, all of the platforms censored us simultaneously,
so it’s essentially a monopoly. So we’re talking YouTube, Instagram, LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, all of us, all went down immediately. The president had re-tweeted us, the president’s son had retweeted us, and from that moment on everything really kind of changed. I did get fired from both of my hospitals. It is a scary experience to get fired, especially when you’ve worked as long as I have to be a board-certified Emergency Physician, that’s what I do. You know, I’m a mom. I’ve kids, you know, it’s not a comfortable feeling to be fired. You don’t know what the future holds. On the other side of this -which is now several months- it’s really been a blessing because we doctors have been able to come forward and speak freely,
11:29 Doctor loses license for not wearing a mask.
and help other doctors who have been put in this situation. There are several of my peers, doctors in the americasfrontlinedoctors group that have faced tremendous personal push back. There’s a fellow right now in Oregon who refused to force the [face] mask, right? He won’t wear it and he won’t force his staff to wear it. If you want to wear it, you could wear it. But the state [inaudible] public about it. So the state of Oregon
actually yanked his medical license. When he first told me this, I thought this this can’t be possible, because I’m also an attorney and, it was impossible to conceive of an event like that happening without due process.
I mean the whole thing about law, it’s all about process. You’ve got to go through the process. You can’t just pull someone’s license. You have to have hearings and phone calls and papers files and all that. I really just thought he missed his deadline, but no, it was true. They actually just summarily pulled his license. It’s unbelievable. So we’re going to help him win. We’ve already filed a lawsuit and all that..

12:29 I go without a mask as much as I possibly can…
And all that so but what I’m saying is it comes with some degree personal cost. But if you ask him, he’ll tell you that he’s so much happier that he did this! He said this! He just felt that he couldn’t bow to the Tyranny. So I just want to encourage anybody in their own personal life, when you face that little tyranny on a daily basis, you know, this is Florida, but you know, I hail from California and you can’t go anywhere without a mask, except I do. I go without a mask as much as I possibly can and you have to take moments like that and push up against tyranny and it’s not just for you. It strengthens your sense of freedom for yourself and makes you stronger. It’s also to role model that strength for other people. So if you feel yeah, [applause] And I say that because a lot of us who are very good-hearted people. We don’t really have the strength sometimes to fight on our own behalf. Well, then tell yourself you’re doing it for the other person who needs to see you without the mask so they can feel empowered.
So I want to run through some information and the goal is to teach you about what’s coming in terms of these experimental vaccines and I’m going to start with a few minutes maybe five minutes on just kind of reviewing the lies about what’s gone on with covid generally and then we’ll turn to that. It’s a lot a lot of interesting stuff.
6:35 PM
First when I first started this I really just wanted to help patients. I couldn’t believe that patients were being denied this this drug. I could sense that we were not going to be able to fix this from a government kind of policy position, because the doctors themselves had drunk the Kool-Aid, and not been willing to prescribe this drug. I tried very hard to get the policy changed, so that hydroxychloroquine could become over the counter in our country just like it is in much of the world. That would have been the best solution for everybody, because it would have taken the decision making out of the hands of the government you could have decided for yourself. If you needed this medicine and the advantage of having that pill in your possession meant that the majority of people would have stop living in fear.

So that was the best solution, but we were unsuccessful in getting that. So we did the next best thing. America’s Front Line Doctors made getting hydroxychloroquine available for the entire nation by going to our website. Then you can consult with the telemedicine doctor. And whether you have covid, you don’t have covid you just worried about getting covid you can get yourself a prescription, and they mail it to you.
The big fight was not the virus. It was the fear!
That was the first thing we did, and I felt so strongly about it just because that’s a practical way that can try to lift the fear, but I learned pretty early that the big fight was the fear. The big fight wasn’t the virus. It was the fear. That was my response to the fear -it was to give people practical solution. Now the fear has led to people = they really just want to go back to normal life- so they’re either can kind of consumed with fear or consumed with being weary of the whole situation. That is what I think is leading to people making what is really a fundamentally irrational
decision to rush headlong towards an experimental medication. They just kind of want to get their lives back. We’ve been told, get the vaccine, you’ll get your life back. I have to give you the bad news. That is definitely not what’s going to happen whether you take a shot or you don’t take a shot. It’s not going to happen. You know, Dr. Fauci. He’s gone public already saying, as many others, the Surgeon General, many others -it was in Business Journal just today, Business Insider I think- this so-called vaccine, experimental biological agent, actually doesn’t stop transmission. You’re gonna have to keep going with the masks and the social distancing. It actually changes nothing.
Once you hear that you really have to question why you would put yourself in that situation. So that’s the starting point. Let’s talk about some enduring covid-19 myths. First, I’m glad that, you know, I can’t be de-platformed here…
About the numbers. Okay. What is the chance that you’ll survive covid if you should get it? Okay. So this is a very educated audience. So if you’re under age 20 according to the CDC, which is not known for its honesty. The survival rate is 99.997% Think about anything in that group. There’s nothing to talk about. For ages 20 to 49 to survival rate is 99.98%. From 50 to 69 the survival rate is 99.5 percent. I always kind of pause there because a lot of people in their 50s they start to get worried and they think oh my gosh, I’m in such a high-risk group is not really that true. Right, this is with no treatment. Your survival is 99.5 percent and if you’re over 70 the survival rate of approaches 95%. Really with with no treatment. .
Now the Dirty Little Secret it’s even better than that. Right. If you take early treatment, this is essentially a either asymptomatic or very mildly symptomatic or completely recoverable. The people who died from covid-19 are people who are kind of destined to die in this period anyway. It is tragic but as people of faith you understand that life and death go hand in hand. My father had an expression: Pneumonia is an old man’s best friend. That means that pneumonia is often the way we exit this world. So if you are at kind of the end point of your life, covid-19 can take you out. That’s a fact. So can a common cold. I’ve seen it I once had a patient in the ICU who died essentially from a nosebleed. It kind of escalated. So anything can take you out if you’re frail and Covid-19 is in that category. Overwhelmingly the covid-19 deaths are in nursing home patients. I have to mention that, because if there was truly the intent to quote-unquote save lives, people would not have thrown away our frail elderly. The politicians that are telling you to do this thing over here, had no problem throwing away the lives of the very frail elderly over there.
I don’t know how many if anybody in this room was watching the corner virus task force meetings as closely as I was but I was watching them every day that I wasn’t at work and I remember watching Governor Cuomo and he was saying that he had to protect the elderly, had to protect the elderly. I thought that was great and then one day, out of the blue, he made this rule that patients from nursing homes who went to the hospital with covid-19, but who survived and were ready to be discharged, could be sent back to the nursing home. And the nursing home is not allowed to ask if they were covid positive or covid negative. In other words, they could completely intermingle with the other patients. To remind you, that big Navy ship that was stationed off of New York City and the Jacob Javits Center were virtually empty. What’s amazing about that is, as an emergency physician, I know all the time we have bed problems. You don’t have a bed here or there, but it was a complete lie to say that there was no room for these patients, or that they would lose their beds in the nursing homes. There were thousands and thousands of empty beds between Jacob Javits and the Navy ship. I remember watching this and thinking that is unbelievable. He’s like an executioner. It was incredible. So I wouldn’t believe anything that somebody like that has said. It was really tragic. He’ll have to answer.

So I start with all of that because you have to understand that the magnitude of the lies is just so enormous. Are you all familiar with the Lancet and the controversy with that?
So the Lancet is probably the world’s most famous medical journal. All right, New England Journal of Medicine is probably second most famous, JAMA, third most famous.
So sometime around April [2020], I think, the Lancet published this study that concluded that hydroxychloroquine wasn’t safe. This threw the world into a tizzy. Based on this article, the WHO stopped hydroxychloroquine trials across the world. The European Union stopped allowing hydroxychloroquine. That was the reason that the headlines trashed the president [Trump, who praised it] and called it snake oil. They had the cover of the Lancet saying it was bad. Now the Lancet study that said it was bad had 90,000 people in it. It took place on 5 continents… and it just didn’t really make sense.
There was a group of independent doctors who looked at this data and said, there’s no way you have 90,000 patients enrolled in a trial across five continents and nobody ever heard of this thing. It was just it was incredible. So these independent doctors got together and they kind of forced the issue.
The Lancet ended up retracting the study which is once in a generation or once-in-a-lifetime sort of event. You can’t be published in the Lancet by accident. There’s many many layers to it. It just simply can’t happen. It was complete fraud that was published, but the damage was done because all across the world hydroxychloroquine trials have been halted and it was very badly maligned. That’s where we’re coming from. We know that that was fraud. They’ve admitted they were fraud. You can go right now to the internet and type in the study on hydroxychloroquine and it’ll pop up retracted. Okay. Now why do I say that was like level number one of the corruption, with the scientists themselves being corrupted.
Level number two – that was the media the media lying. How do we know they’re lying and not just misinformed or ill-inform themselves? Well, because when it was retracted, they buried the story of its being retracted you have to really struggle to find that information. That’s very dishonest. And then there is corruption at the state level.
We’ll save that for another day. So let’s talk about these what I call I think it’s most properly called experimental biological agents. You might hear me use that phrase. Definitely you should not be calling this the covid-19 vaccines. The reason is, whatever you call it, it’s experimental. It’s not been approved as a vaccine. It’s currently in its investigational stage. It’s been approved by – I don’t want to speak for sure here- The FDA, I assume, is the one who would approve it, but it’s in an investigational stage only.
AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson. That’s very important legally. If you were to be injured by something and it’s an experimental stage it is adjudicated under particular standard. So what are the potential problems with this experimental biological agent? The first most obvious is that this is brand-new technology. The first two that are coming to market use mRNA technology, which is never ever been used before for vaccines. When you hear a lot of concern and flamboyant issues, it’s because people are very worried that this is brand-new mRNA technology. I don’t really go down that path. But what I can say is I don’t really want to be the first person to take brand new things when it comes to medicine, right? You don’t have to be a genius to say that. That’s problem number one. Problem number two
24.21 previous coronavirus attempts have been made
is there’s been a tremendous failure of previous corona virus vaccines. This is not well known, but there are multiple coronavirus viruses out there. For example in 2002. There was an epidemic, a much smaller epidemic of SARs-Cov-1. What we’re in right now is SARs-CoV-2/ covid-19. By the way, you may have heard a call the novel coronavirus art what we’re in right now. I never understood that because this corona virus is 78% identical
to SARs-CoV-1. They are 78% the same. Prior coronavirus vaccine attempts have been made.
They have failed. They can’t do it safely in human beings. I’m going to talk more about that later, but just note we have not been able to successfully overcome that the human bodily hurdles that making a vaccine against a coronavirus has put up. Number three: there is no independently published animal studies. One of the companies says they do have animal studies, but they haven’t published any data on it. There’s been a complete rush to put this to market.
You simply cannot do this safely without published data on animal studies because animals often will die at the end. And unless we know that we don’t know if it’s safe to give to humans.
Problem number 4 is known complications. One of the most commonly known complications of vaccines is, (big science words here!) something called antibody-dependent enhancement. It is also sometimes called immune enhancement, and is sometimes called pathogenic priming. What this is, is instead of really causing immunity, it causes a person to over react in a negative way if they should be ultimately exposed to the virus.
This antibody dependent enhancement or pathogenic priming is well known to scientists. I like to say it has its own Wikipedia page. This is not fringe, this exists and this is real the biggest problem with antibody dependent enhancement. We see this with prior coronavirus vaccines. So when they were doing the studies with SARs-CoV-1 vaccine back in 2005, they came up with a vaccine. they gave it to the ferrets and it was two doses, like the ones today, and the ferrets did find after the first dose. They did fine after the second dose. Later they exposed them to the coronavirus SARs-CoV-1 one in the wild, and the ferrets died. That’s why SARS CoV-1 vaccine never came to market – antibody dependent enhancement. You can find all the information I’m discussing on ->vaccine information.
Also on the site, it has it there as well.
Everything is well footnoted and referenced. Known complications include antibody dependent enhancement and also some of the things you’ve seen in the news like neurologic problems like transverse myelitis, Bell’s Palsy, Guillain-Barre, etc. Those are known complications with vaccines that already exist. There’s also a lot of issues with unknown vaccinations. I think what’s going wrong on the other side is that is a complete lack of respect. Except for what? You don’t know we don’t know what we don’t know until you discover it. I mean, these are the things parents teach their children. They don’t know enough, right? So what are the potential unknowns? Well, something that I learned this year, actually the last few months- I was shocked because never saw this anywhere in the newspaper. I’d like to show of hands from anybody here who’s heard of this before my mentioning. Has anybody here heard of potential fertility problems with this vaccine? [Several hands up.]
That’s amazing. You guys could I I did not know this myself until about maybe two months ago. So I had to look into it. And by the way the americasfrontlinedoctors just put this together, 10 doctors working for more than a month
28:28 Covid-19 & fertility
to put together all this research. So There’s a question if this vaccine the biological agent, I should say affects this thing called a syncytium trophoblast which is a layer on the placenta.
[The syncytiotrophoblast, the outermost layer of the human placenta, is the main site of exchange for drugs and metabolites, nutrients, waste products, and gases between the maternal and fetal circulations. Efficient transfer of nutrients, gases, electrolytes, and solutes across the placenta is essential for fetal growth and development.]
Now, it does seem to do that when you’re sick with covid-19. The problem is that these mRNA vaccines kind of mimic having covid-19 indefinitely. So while covid-19 could be bad for the placenta and the baby if you get it like in the middle of the pregnancy, eventually covid-19 goes away and you go about your life and you’re good. There’s a question.
If this type of experimental agent, does that same negative effect to this tissue of trophoblast layer of the placenta and would it do it indefinitely. This is not a conspiracy as a scientist. I’m telling you. We don’t know. We don’t know. Scientists better than me, right- there’s two guys [M. Yeadon, W. Wodarg] in Europe that were asked Pfizer Executives that complained about this and filed a petition with the European equivalent of The FDA, saying you’ve got to NOT approve this as an emergency experimental vaccine, because we haven’t answered the question on the antibody dependent enhancement, and we haven’t answered the question on the placenta.
It hasn’t been answered. It’s dangerous to release this. And you have to put that together with what is the risk of even having this problem? Certainly in younger women, right, women under 50. The survival rate, per the CDC is 99.98%. For that reason, AmericasFrontLineDoctors, feel very strongly that you cannot even offer this to women of childbearing age. We’ll get our official recommendations at the end.
But I put we put that information under the category of what we don’t know. We simply don’t know. We don’t know what the effect is permanently on the placenta. Another fact that is very concerning is that Pharmaceuticals who manufacturer these experimental biological agents are immune from all liability? I’m not say that they have a negative motivation; I think mostly they have a profit motive. I’m not saying they’re trying to hurt people, kill people. What I am saying is that if you know that you could be sued and paying millions of dollars every single time something goes wrong, you’re really really careful. Okay, you’re a little less careful if you know you’re going to be shielded from that liability.
They’ve completely shielded. So people ask me: Am I going to take the vaccine? Would I recommend my children take the vaccine? I said, it’s really irrational to take a brand new untested, untried technology from a company that’s completely shielded from immunity, when on the other hand I’ve A drug that 65 years old has been given billions of times completely safe for all age groups, right? [applause]
7:12 PM
Now those are the safety concerns with this experimental biological agent. What are the concerns regarding the effectiveness? Now, what’s super shocking, is that there’s no proof that this biological agent actually stops the transmission amongst people. I mean, it’s like it’s like a joke, right? It’s like the punch line to a joke. Let’s take a back seat. It doesn’t actually stop transmission. I mean, I don’t even know what to say to that. I discovered that quite recently, and I just I couldn’t believe it. That’s, by the way, that’s not in dispute. The Surgeon General gave an interview 20 days ago, two weeks and six days ago on a Monday to Good Morning America, stating that -and it’s been well documented now- it is not known if it stops transmission. I think what’s going to happen, you know, it’s kind of putting people into sort of an asymptomatic carrier kind of state. In other words, people are turning positive.
[Statements that the vaccine won’t cause PCR +ves and claims that it may lessen transmission have been made several months subsequent to this talk.]
You might have started to see some new stories. Now people taking the vaccine and now they’re testing positive for covid-19. It’s kind of funny. Like we don’t are they going to test positive for ever? Like what does that mean? You know, they’ve been selling us this bill of goods that there’s this asymptomatic transmission. That seems to be moot. But if you going to have, you know tens or hundreds of millions running around just kind of positive low-level like what does that mean? Like, why are we doing that? Another problem with doing that is that I think they’re going to gain the numbers right? All these people. Let’s say you give this vaccine to a hundred million people. And now all hundred million people have quote/unquote testing positive for covid-19. They’re going to tell us that the cases have risen and you know, we can never relax.
[Note: more recent answers to the same question say the vaccines rarely or never directly cause a false or even cold positive.]
It’s unbelievable. There’s been no proof that this is actually reducing mortality. Certainly from the levels of non-lethality that we’re seeing, it would be hard to demonstrate that there’s any real advantage, right? The odds of dying from this disease are already incredibly low.
The third question about its effectiveness. We simply don’t know, even if it was effective and not dangerous, we don’t know how long it lasts. In other words, are you going to be asked to take this vaccine once-in-a-lifetime? Are you going to be asked to take this vaccine yearly, like influenza. We don’t know. Those questions are not answered.

I keep referencing the fact that we need to call this by its proper name. Never talk about this without the word ‘experimental’. That’s critical. One of the problems that we doctors are concerned about -this antibody dependent enhancement potential- which again, I’m not saying it exists or doesn’t exist. I’m saying it hasn’t been answered. If you’re going to run around and give this vaccine to whole bunch of healthy people, you have to be really, really sure. Taking a vaccine is very different than taking a drug for a disease. If you have a disease you certainly willing to take on more risk, right, to get rid of the disease, but vaccines are typically given to healthy people. Now what’s going to happen if you give this vaccine to a hundred million people that are otherwise healthy, and they do have this antibody dependent enhancement reaction, because we haven’t ruled it out. They do get exposed to the virus in the wild, and 30% of them drop.
And what if for example, you’ve given that vaccine to all of your health care workers, and you’ve given that vaccine to all of your military and to all of your police officers. I find that shocking as a public policy matter that we would even consider giving anything to our healthy first responders and frontline people who defend our country. It’s it’s so shocking in its risk. I’m struggling for the words. It’s so shocking to accept that kind of risk. And again, I want to be not misquoted. I’m not saying this is definitely going to happen. But I’m saying based on prior SARS coronavirus vaccines, there is a definite concern for antibody dependent enhancement.
This particular virus has very low lethality. Should you give the vaccine to healthy people not knowing the answer to that question? It is far too risky in my opinion from a national security perspective. [applause]
You know the more you dig into the stuff, the more upsetting it gets, so I gave this talk only once before about two weeks ago, and I approached the black community. I’d like to just talk straight and openly. I was well aware as a physician, that African-Americans and other black and brown minority persons had a natural antipathy towards vaccines. And I wanted to give him the science behind it. So I ended up digging deeply into that issue. So let me share some things that I knew, and some of these things I did not know prior to this year. Many of you in the room have heard of the Tuskegee experiments [spell?], but there’s a lot more than that. I was curious as to why the antipathy was so strong. Let me give you some examples of where vaccines have gone wrong for black and brown people. So with the rubella vaccine, race and ethnicity were shown to affect the antibody responses at a higher level compared to Europeans With the measles virus, -many of you in this room-they also had that same experience. With pertussis, it was also the same. With the inweet [unidentifiable], they also had the same problem as with the measles. Haemophilus influenza also had the same difference in the response and the hepatitis vaccine also had this similar different response among races. Specifically, white boys were 64 percent less likely to have autism diagnosis relative to non white boys when they gave the hepatitis vaccine to babies. Now, literally as a physician, I did not know this right here. We have examples well documented in the scientific literature of six different vaccines that were affecting people differently based on their races. Now why is this important?
37:53 The CDC is telling black people that getting the vaccine early is racial justice
Because when you read the language that the government is putting out about how to prioritize the vaccine -the experimental biological agent. They are making an overt and covert attempt to push this heavily on black and brown. I’m going to give you some specific language because it is just shocking. One moment.
All right. Okay, the CDC is telling the public at large that getting an experimental vaccine is a good thing, but it’s additionally telling black people getting the vaccine is racial justice and it’s an advantage. Now, this is from the Center for Health Security dot-org Interim Framework for Covid-19 Vaccine Allocation and Distribution in the US. This is the government’s words — that getting the vaccine early is social justice, racial justice – I just have to say as a scientist. I found it bizarre that were talking about racial justice. Either something works scientifically or it doesn’t. There might be racial differences in terms of dosages. We’ve seen that now in these prior six, but how is it racial justice to sign up first for an experimental biological
agent that we don’t know.
In the same document, they say the ultimate safety of an approved vaccine is not knowable until it has been administered to millions of people. It is possible that certain adverse effects may occur more frequently in certain population subgroups, which may not be apparent until millions are vaccinated. Pharmacovigilance Track and Trace systems will provide critical information that will inform adjustments to the to Allocation. That literally is in the same document, as let’s give it to black folks first.
You know, you can’t even make this stuff up.
They also said (in our words) the most disenfranchised members of society are to be vaccinated first. Their words: “racial and ethnic minorities, tribal, incarcerated, rural, disabilities, underinsured, people who work in school settings, and nurses, and we must prioritize blacks and Latinos so as to reflect fairness and Justice”.
I just find a so incredibly offensive. We know exactly who falls from Covid-19. Its nursing home patients. Its people with 2.6% co-morbidities per person is the is average, people over 75 or living in nursing homes. This is who should get the vaccine first, if you believe the vaccine is safe and effective. That’s it, and I feel very offended on this because you know the people they are going to target for, honestly, are my friends, which are all the black nurses that I work with in the ERs, because I’ve spent my whole career in the inner city. And so they’re all being told you gotta line up, you gotta take this. And I’m thinking to myself, well, you’re about 45 years old 50 years old, young, good health, you’re working every day. Why should you be prioritized? There’s no actual increased risk to the health care worker there. The risk, we know who it is, it is the 80 year old woman who’s living in a nursing home or man is living in a nursing home with bad heart, bad lungs, diabetes, especially obesity is a big deal. Those people are high risk.
It’s not your 45 year old nurse. It’s not your 35 year old cop. Okay, and any other discussion I find very disingenuous. Now, in case you didn’t believe that, you went further into these documents and you find the language…they talk about targeting the black community by understanding their their quote unquote vaccine hesitancy based on these issues with prior vaccines, and Tuskegee, but they have actual policies. They say -this is from Strategy for Distributing CoVid-19 Vaccine. They say we have to focus on targeting key populations and communities to ensure maximum vaccine acceptance and they quote The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation about how to manipulate the media and silence
the opposition to it. And the they put famous, handsome, you know, celebrities saying that they’re going to take the vaccine, Obama being one of them. It’s very clear. It’s just very very clear what’s going on.
So I say to you as a scientist. Do you want to be first? If you want to be first, to volunteer yourself for Track and Trace System enrolling yourself into a medical trial? I don’t think I explained that clearly. Let me back up for one second. If you take the vaccine, you’re being enrolled in a pharmacovigilance tracking system. It means you’ve enrolled yourself in a medical trial, which is fine. If you are to be a good-hearted individual, very altruistic, and you want to enroll yourself into a medical trial, fantastic. I can tell you as a physician that very few people want to do that.
7:24 PM
Okay, but if you want to do that, that’s fine. But you most people are not aware that that’s what they’re doing. This pharmacovigilance tracking system tracks you for two years. It was set up by the Department of Defense. It was handed off to Oracle and Google to put the data together. How is it that people want to sign up for this system, on an experimental… and how is giving it to black people fair and justice.
I don’t know. Maybe someone smarter than me can figure that out.
Once I started reading what I thought was just pure racism in these documents, it kind of made it clear to me why we were hearing so much about racial issues with covid-19. In my experience as an ER doctor, I didn’t see any real racial issues at all. We saw white people, Latino people, and black people who had got it. Basically if you were old and frail and you got it, you know, you were sick, but I never really saw a racial difference. There are other things obviously that do have racial differences. So I remember thinking, this is weird, you know, AOC would get forward and say, oh, this is just really bad against black people. This is terrible, and it’s discrimination. Here’s what I want to say to that. It’s true that in there are many areas where black people were disproportionately affected by covid-19. So an example I like to use was in New Orleans, Louisiana where blacks made up 31% of the population, but they made up 70% of the people admitted to the hospital with covid-19. So on the left they were saying this was because of racism. But when you look at the data, there does not yet appear, and I think never will appear, race to be an independent risk factor. We know what makes people really sick. It’s diabetes and obesity primarily, and then other serious medical problems, and also living/working in a very crowded area.
The reason I don’t think this is ever going to be shown to be a racial problem, race problem is that you just know by Common Sense one is it’s been all over the world, all races. Second is in areas of the world where people have those high individual risk factors like diabetes or obesity and other illnesses, and their group risk factors, such as living and working in tight quarters, it’s not black people that get it at a worse rate, it’s those people in those situations. So in Louisiana, it was black people but in the UK, it was Middle Eastern and East Asians, in other words, people living in those crowded, dense areas, who have diabetes. [Among] those people, it didn’t matter what their race was, if you have those individual a group risk factors. Of course, the irony of saying that this is really a racial problem is looking at the continent of Africa. The one continent that’s been spared is Africa except South Africa, but the rest of Africa has death rates extraordinarily low. For those of you who don’t know this or haven’t followed me yet on Twitter at America’s Frontline doctors, there’s a lot of videos.
One of my favorites is a talk we gave on sub-Saharan Africa because people just don’t know this. In America, the death rates are in the 800 per million range. In India, the death rates are around might be slightly off on the numbers, around 70 per million raised with 10% because they have a very liberal hydroxychloroquine policy. In Africa. Sub-Saharan Africa the poorest places in the world. No social distancing, no mask. They have a death rate of 1% of that of the western Nations. One percent!
Now, I believe it’s due to widely available hydroxychloroquine. I don’t think you can explain it for any other reason, but even if there’s another reason you’re certainly can’t say that this affects black people worse.
I would just not be signing up for this immediately. I think of my friends, the nurses -if I were a nurse and a mom, I think I say, I’ll just wait a bit and see.
When we doctors got together on this, we decided to really come out and say what we thought our opinion was. A lot of people have told us not to do that, but we felt it was really important. You have you have the CDC, the NIH, the FDA all not helping you.
47:42 America’s Frontline Doctors’ Recommendations for Covid-19 Vaccines
So we came up with our recommendations about the vaccine and and they’re pretty strong. Ultimately America’s Front Line doctors stands as follows: If you’re under age 20, the experimental vaccine is prohibited, in our opinion, absolutely prohibited. We simply don’t know enough about the effects on fertility. And we do know this virus essentially does not affect young people, it’s essentially irrelevant. From age 20 to 50. If you’re healthy, we strongly discourage. There’s a little debate in our group if we would come down as strongly discouraged in this group or as prohibited. I fell in the prohibited category, but the majority of us said just strongly discourage for age 20 to 50.
We strongly discourage the vaccine age 20 to 50 because there’s an exceedingly low risk of death from Covid. There’s unknown risk from the experimental vaccine of causing autoimmune disease. There’s unknown risk of this pathogenic priming antibody enhancement and there’s unknown risk of lifelong infertility. So for age 20 to 50 we think it is strongly discouraged.
From age 50 to 70. If you’re healthy, we also say strongly discouraged for the same reasons. There’s a very low risk from covid-19. There’s an unknown risk of autoimmune disease, unknown risk of pathogenic priming, unknown effect on the placenta. From age 50 to 70 and you do have serious comorbid conditions, we say it is discouraged. We say that because we feel the experimental vaccine is higher risk than early or prophylactic treatment with long-established medications such as hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin.
From age 70 and above, if you’re healthy, we tell people it’s just your own personal risk assessment. We believe in experimental vaccine is less ideal than old established medicines, but we say leave it up to the person.
Over age 70 with serious comorbid conditions such as those in nursing homes, we also call it
to personal risk assessment. We again stand with hydroxychloroquine Ivermectin being safer in this population, but we don’t think it’s irrational to take it if you’re over 70 living in a nursing home. We don’t think that that’s irrational. We’re not trying to say all vaccines are unsafe in all circumstances. We don’t believe anybody at any age should be pressured and we are concerned about persons over 70 who don’t have advocates being pressured into this. We already know actually have many cases like that. But we also don’t want people to be overly worried that were saying it’s definitely unsafe. We’re not saying it’s definitely unsafe, we’re saying we don’t know and at least if you’re over 70 with several medical conditions, you do have some risk of dying from this thing Covid. So it’s not fundamentally irrational to take it if you should decide to take it. But certainly under age 50 we fall at strongly discouraged I myself would I tell everybody I would never let a woman of childbearing age take this. I would never, under no circumstances. I would fight tooth and nail until this placenta question is answered.
I always like to leave people with a bit of a call to action.
We intend from America’s Frontline Doctors to fight the urge that’s sweeping the globe to mandate people taking an experimental biological agent. This is a big fight we have in our hand. It’s not really the government first that were concerned about. We’re very concerned about private businesses mandating this – employers, schools, and travel, airlines in particular. You can imagine if all the airlines got together, the CEOs, and said: You know what? We’re just going to mandate this. What if the sixth biggest ones got together and said that? It’s just like the masks, right?
You can’t avoid their mandates. This is a very big problem. So America’s Front Line Doctors is tackling this. We intend to talk to the decision makers in the airline industry. One of our tools in that battle will be to go in armed with at least at least 1 million signatures of human beings who say no, we are not going to do business with anybody who wants to mandate this.
Everyone, whether you want to take the vaccine, you want your mom to take the vaccine that’s your choice. But I think everyone hearing this could agree. We don’t need the CEOs of big companies forcing experimental biological agents on anyone.
52:32 [applause]
What I need you to see now though before we get to that point is that we are going to be at their mercy if we don’t get ahead of them. We must get ahead of that bad decision that they seemed headed towards making. Qantas Airlines has already said that they’re going to do this. We need to go to these airlines. We have a plan. Part of that plan is at least a million signatures. You must go to and sign the petition. You also must share that petition with everyone. Do not be shy. Okay, this is your life. Are you going to be able to travel and it’s not just your personal travel for fun? But can you Advocate? Can you go to Washington DC and Advocate if you can’t get on a plane?
This is really important. Stop medical discrimination dot-org. It is your obligation.
I’ve done my part my Dr. Just have done their part. You must do your people come up to me all the time. What can I do? This is such a small thing. Not only do you sign it, each of you should take it on yourself to say I’m gonna make sure I get a thousand signatures, I’m gonna send it to this Facebook group and to that Facebook group. Everyone, everyone everywhere must stop medical discrimination dot-org critical critical.
If you are part of a union you should be bringing this to the Union as the humanitarian or human rights issue. Your union should advocate for you. This may sound strange to people because they think the Union’s on the other side. Maybe they are, but the union hasn’t even heard the facts. If you’ve heard of a union you should stand up and say I don’t want this forced on me. If you know a pilot,
pilots union, teachers union, nurses union, very important. Phrase this s a human rights issue. This is not anti-vaccination. I’m always reminding: Please tell people where I stand on vaccine issue. I personally have been vaccinated for everything. I personally make sure my kids have been vaccinated for everything. This is a human rights issue that we cannot mandate human beings take experimental agents and the and the third and the third call to actually use always use the word experimental when you talk about this. The socialist changes the language
7:43 PM
As I said to you this was the Wuhan virus then it became the coronavirus then it became covid-19. This is the battle for words. The word to remember is not ‘vaccine” the word to remember is ‘experimental’. . Now if you need backup for everything I’ve said, all of this is on our website America’s Frontline Doctors under vaccine information. It’s also on You’ve got a 35-page paper with 70 references. Everything is clean and clear. So you don’t have to know all this yourself. It’s all there for you. So the call to action Sign it. Sharon, go to your union.. And teach everyone that the vaccine is experimental via any outlet you have. [end]
56:08 Return to Transcripts Page Return to Home Page