This is not the site page to come to for detailed information on each of the Covid-19 vaccines!
It is/ will be only a compilation of some opinions not to be found in mainstream media. Links are within and more are at the end.
The best part of Medscape are the comments buried below the articles:
Below a May 23 article on censorship we have.
‘One thing I noticed is the rapid adoption of the “vaccine as a cure” vs. natural immunity for a disease that is 99% survivable. That should be a clue what is driving this mayhem.’
“Frankly I do not believe there will ever be a successful vaccine as the virus modifies into a specific virus for a specific host. The only efficient treatment and solution is reactivation of adaptive immunity.” French virologist and Nobel prize winner Luc Antoine Montagnier says much the same thing. He expects variable viruses to bind with the antibodies produced after vaccination and that this will worsen the disease. Vaccine is a magic word, he says, but people watching television have to learn that sometimes instead of preventing infection it makes it worse.
Vaccine$ for Everyone??? What are your odds?
Despite the fact that the vast majority survive Covid-19 easily and often without symptoms, the “vaccines” are being pushed onto everyone.
Harvard Professor Martin Kulldorff and co-creator of the Great Barrington Declaration, one of the most cited epidemiologists and infectious -disease experts in the world tweeted that not everyone needs a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 , certainly not children nor those who have recovered from Covid. Twitter put a warning on it and disallowed re-tweeting.
Dr. Peter McCullough, professor of medicine at Texas A&S said “There is no scientific rationale to vaccinate young and healthy people.
A recent article in Nature, précised in the BMJ, said that young people under 20 are only about half as susceptible to Covid as those over 65. And if they do catch the virus, more often than not, they have few or no symptoms. Children appear to have even more immunity. Children are less susceptible than they are to the flu. Is giving hastily developed vaccines to young people and children who do not need them ethical?
More expert discussion about vaccinating everyone is at dryburgh’s site.
Do The Current Vaccines Undermine Non-Specific Immunity?
Medscape comment: “The problem is that antibodies are easy to measure while cellular responses are not. I’m an immunologist and I’m surprised how little MDs know or remember about immunology. My bold prediction is that antibody responses will never be protective for many viruses. Covid can infect cell to cell without exposing itself to antibodies in the blood. The immune response is “steered” by T Helper cells which have two subsets, 1 and 2. TH1 cells promote cellular immunity and Th2 cells promote a humoral response. They are counter regulatory.
Any vaccine promoting a Th2 antibody response actually suppresses protective TH1 immunity. The age difference seen in covid is due to immuno-senescence or the shift from TH1 bias as children to Th2 bias as we age. The mortality rate of covid-19 vs. age correlates exactly with this.”
Another said that since children are almost never affected, that the problem lies with the host not with the virus.
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche says exactly that. He is calling for an immediate halt to mass vaccination because it (along with the prolonging measures of lockdown and distancing) will lead to mutations with greater virulence and to depression of non-specific immunity.
G. Vanden Bossche, DVM, PhD
As stated, I am not against vaccination. On the contrary, I can assure you that each of the current vaccines have been designed, developed and manufactured by brilliant and competent scientists. However, this type of prophylactic vaccines [sic] are completely inappropriate, and even highly dangerous, when used in mass vaccination campaigns during a viral pandemic. Vaccinologists, scientists and clinicians are blinded by the positive short-term effects in individual patents, but don’t seem to bother about the disastrous consequences for global health.
In a public comment to the CDC on 23 April 2021, molecular biologist and toxicologist Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay, Ph.D., called to immediately halt Covid vaccine production and distribution. Citing fertility, blood-clotting concerns (coagulopathy), and immune escape, Dr. Lindsay explained to the committee the scientific evidence showing that the coronavirus vaccines are not safe.
DO The Vaccines Even Work? What about this 90% Efficiency? Ask a Canadian virologist!
For an expert look at efficiency, see the most excellent site Dryburgh.com, with Guelph University Professor Byram Bridle. He has an extract from an FDA document that says:
“Among 3410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population [≅ 40,000], 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group. Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were 409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group. It is possible that the imbalance in suspected COVID-19 cases occurring in the 7 days post vaccination represents vaccine reactogenicity with symptoms that overlap with those of COVID-19. Overall though, these data do not raise a concern that protocol-specified reporting of suspected, but unconfirmed COVID-19 cases could have masked clinically significant adverse events that would not have otherwise been detected.”
Does that sound efficient? Bridle goes on to say that inclusion of unconfirmed cases might make the so-said 90% efficiency look more like 19% to 20%. What happened to the WHO statement that vaccines should be at least 50% effective to be approved?
Bridle goes on to say, “So personally, if I don’t have it already, I would probably because I’m in the low risk demographic, I would probably prefer to have natural immunity, honestly. And not that narrowly focused immunity [from vaccination], just so that even if I do get infected with a novel variant, that’s almost certainly going to be blunted.”
For another great read and sober second thought on efficiency, see the Off-Guardian.
Statistics….Truth or Dare?
Dr Hervé Seligmann Faculty of Medicine, Aix-Marseille University thinks the Pfizer shot increased mortality according to an Israel National News story, 18 Feb. 2021
And What Happens When Wild Covid Comes Around?
Earlier attempts to make animal corona vaccines that failed because they over-stimulated the immune system, and subsequent exposure to the wild virus caused fatal reactions in animal studies.
Several doctors are warning that vaccinating someone who is infected with Covid could be deadly.
According to America’s Frontline doctors, whether this dangerous antibody dependent enhancement or pathogenic priming or paradoxical immune enhancement or antibody-dependent amplification (ADE) is going to be a problem with recent vaccines was not known as of late 2020.
The AFLD are recommending that it NOT be offered to women of child-bearing age because of lack of testing. From their report: ‘The vaccine companies themselves acknowledge the possibility of ill effects on a pregnancy on the vaccine bottle, which says the following: “it is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA VaccineBNT162b2 has an impact on fertility. And women of childbearing age are advised to avoid pregnancy for at least two months after their second dose.”’ Except the AFLDs are wondering about permanent damage, not transitory.
NOTE: According to a Pfizer document updated 19 May 2021, an experiment injecting both pre-conception and pregnant rats with the vaccine produced no adverse effects.
And From the Frontlines in Canada..
We have the Dr. Charles Hoffe, MD, whose tiny aboriginal community in BC had access to the Moderna vaccine, the first dose, as early as January 2021. He is less than pleased by the number of serious adverse events after only 900 first doses have been given out. He has seen serious neurological effects, as well as more anaphylaxis than the vaccine company would have led one to expect after only 900 doses. His reporting of this was met with a gag order and a reprimand. Read his interview here.
More on adverse reactions.
Guelph Prof Bridle: “It’s crazy in Canada, we’re not bothering to test people for pre-existing immunity before vaccinating them.” And Dr. Hooman Noorchashm….. says: “the people who are having complications or adverse events are the people who have recently or are currently or previously infected [with COVID]. I don’t think we can ignore this.”
Should we worry about the research?
Dr. Michael Yeadon, former chief science officer at Pfizer, and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, an MD specializing in pneumology & public health and former Bundestag member and honorary member of the Council of European Parliaments, have some reservations about the experimental nature of current vaccine candidates. They want a halt to development. And they have a petition. (December 2020). They say the efficacy cannot be determined using PCR data They are also concerned that insufficient testing has been done to see if there is the same risk to the placenta as Covid itself has. They also do not believe the risk of dangerous antibody amplification has yet been investigated. Nor did the America’s FrontLine Doctors in late 2020.
In an April 2021 interview, Dr. Yeadon described the potential risks and the significance of some adverse effects seen from mRNA vaccines. He is shocked by what he sees as the unethical and risky recent practice of pushing these vaccines on young people, especially young women, pregnant women and children. He has no interest in the vaccines for his family, but would not object to senior citizens taking them.
Sites ↑ and below.
Dr. J. Patrick Whelan, M.D., Ph.D sent similar concerns to the FDA in December 2020
” I am concerned about the possibility that the new vaccines aimed at creating immunity against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (including the mRNA vaccines of Moderna and Pfizer) have the potential to cause microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver, and kidneys in a way that does not currently appear to be assessed in safety trials of these potential drugs. ” “Particular caution will be required with regard to the potential widespread vaccination of children before there are any real data on the safety or effectiveness of these vaccines in pediatric trials that are only now beginning.”
These doctors are also less than enthusiastic.
Doctors for Covid Ethics
Education: COVID-19 Vaccine — Physicians for Informed Consent
In a Medscape article, “the fastest time for developing a vaccine to date is 4 years, for the mumps vaccine.” Elsewhere, there was dismay about the short life of naturally formed antibodies. Then there is a Problem with terminology. The mRNA “vaccines” are not vaccines, which are defined as inactive antigen material to stimulate the immune system. The mRNA programs the cells to make a piece of the antigen. Apparently even Moderna calls it gene therapy….
There is still no HIV vaccine and no vaccine for the first SARs. When SARs began to fade away, funding for vaccine research was cut. A cynic could see a profit motive in keeping Covid fear going for as long as possible.
CAN WE TRUST BIG PHARMA?
In May 2020, Lancet & the NEJM published a huge study that discredited hydroxychloroquine. It was found to be fraudulent. The study was never done. The journals retracted the paper. Being retracted was described as shockingly rare. Was this fake study intentional? Cheap treatments are not in the interest of vaccine makers. Later, a leaked conversation of the journal editors included the admission that “we are not going to be able to publish clinical research data because the pharmaceutical companies are so financially powerful …as to have us accept papers apparently methodologically perfect but which in reality manage to conclude what they want them to conclude”.
This was revealed by the former health minister of France in an interview on French TV. He said, “I never thought the boss of The Lancet could say that. And the boss of the New England Jl of Medicine too. He even said it was ‘criminal’ -the word was used by them.” More sites for this below.
Pfizer paid the biggest fine in history for fraudulently promoting a drug for purposes not approved and for bribing doctors in 2009. Astra Zeneca was accused of having paid doctors to give speeches and publish articles (ghostwritten by the company) promoting those unapproved uses of its drug Seroquel, and was accused of not disclosing its risks. Citizens groups also sued it for keeping a cheap alternative to Tamoxifen off the market. J&J has a long rap sheet, and now wants to give Covid vaccines to children who suffer less from Covid than from the flu.
In 2017 The Globe and Mail did a study of conflicts of interest in setting clinical guidelines. It found that panelists setting guidelines typically had multiple funding from or financial ties to pharmaceutical companies. Another study found payments to doctors for writing prescriptions. In the US, the pharmaceutical industry spent US$306mm on lobbying in 2020.
Is there an honest appraisal of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, not to mention zinc and other supplements?
The above fraudulent article was discovered. How many more dishonest articles planted by Pharma are corrupting research? Designed-to-fail studies on inexpensive supplements are common. There still remain HCQ articles with no zinc or a wrong dosage and/or wrong timing. One Medscaper complained that non-Western countries’ positive studies of low cost remedies, especially HCQ, are being ignored. Ivermectin is widely used in India. There is censorship of those doctors who believe in early stage treatment – something not in the interest of vaccine makers.
..……………….ULTERIOR MOTIVES? ………..DÉJÀ VU?
In 2010, yes TEN YEARS AGO, after a proposal by Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg (who, along with Dr. Yeadon are now calling for a halt to Covid vaccine development), the Council of Europe members inquired into the ‘”Golden Triangle” of drug corruption between WHO, the Pharma industry and academic scientists that has permanently damaged the lives of millions and even caused death’ after the swine flu vaccine fiasco. They gave up on the vaccine & H1N1 disappeared into history.
“In order to promote their patented drugs and vaccines against flu, pharmaceutical companies influenced scientists and official agencies, responsible for public health standards to alarm governments worldwide and make them squander tight health resources for inefficient vaccine strategies…..The Parliamentary inquiry will look into the issue of a “falsified pandemic” that was declared by WHO in June 2009“
If you are discouraged by vaccines, go to the Immunity Page!
MORE SITES & full urls
Dryburgh.com (Should every one get vaccinated?) This site may be all readers need to find essential information not in mainstream media.
Interview with Prof. Bridle of Guelph U. https://dryburgh.com/byram-bridle-coronavirus-vaccine-concerns/
G. Vanden Bossche, DVM, PhD update 17 March 2021. See this site for detailed explanation of his concerns and description of Covid-19 vaccine mechanism
They can’t keep up with the mutations which will get worse.
Michael Yeadon Trashes the Vaccine Breakthrough in December 2020
Michael Yeadon on mRNA vaccines, video interview with Taylor Hudak in April 2021
Dr. Peter McCullough
Dr. Yeadon and Dr. Wodarg call for a halt to vaccine development
Dr. Wodarg’s paper is here https://www.wodarg.com/english/
A Vaxxing Question “The concerns of Yeadon, Wodarg and others appear to be borne out…”
Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay, Ph.D
On YouTube for now…… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Vj3xGT6izE
with a transcript at https://www.jennifermargulis.net/halt-covid-vaccine-research-scientist-urges-cdc/
and at https://www.globalresearch.ca/halt-covid-vaccine-prominent-scientist-tells-cdc
Google’s fact checkers are busy on this at https://factcheck.afp.com/scientist-makes-inaccurate-claims-covid-19-vaccine-safety
“DEATH rates in Israel after large scale vaccination” 18 Feb. 2021
Dr Hervé Seligmann, Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Fac. of Med., Aix-Marseille University,
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/297051 18 Feb 2021
A front-page article appeared in the FranceSoir newspaper about findings on the Nakim website regarding what some experts are calling “the high mortality caused by the vaccine.”
also at https://theduran.com/death-rates-skyrocket-in-israel-following-pfizer-experimental-covid-vaccines/
Harvard Med School’s Professor Martin Kulldorff
Dr. Whelan’s letter to the CDC https://www.regulations.gov/document/FDA-2020-N-1898-0246
Prof/ Dr Hooman Noorchashm,
https://newsvoice.se/2021/03/kirurg-vaccinera-covid-19/ on Swedish news
Doctors for Covid Ethics: https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/media-e62e653bab92
Relevant to the questionable policy of vaccinating children
Six children (1%) died in hospital, all of whom had profound comorbidity…a “strikingly low” fatality rate .
(UK population is ~65 million)
Under 20s have low susceptibility to virus
https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m2439 17 June 2020 Cite as: BMJ 2020;369:m2439
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0962-9 original article
May 2021 document from Pfizer
It is not a vaccine. Even Moderna calls it gene therapy.
Interview with PhD David Martin 25 Jan 2021
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/294852 good discussion
Vaccine Information – America’s Frontline Doctors
https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com/vaccines/ scroll down for .pdf
Transcript of Dr. Simone Gold on the vaccines https://randomphilipics.ca/transcripts/afld2
“Post-vaccination risk of non-influenza respiratory pathogen was higher in children. Patient perceptions of illness following influenza vaccination may be supported.”
www.medscape.com/viewarticle/931330 prospects for a vaccine
This May 2020 article is obviously out of date, HOWEVER, the comments are priceless!
(These are not links for all Medscape subscriber comments. Not all names are genuine & they cannot always be verified. )
ULTERIOR MOTIVES IN 2009
Philippe Douste-Blazy, Cardiology MD, Former France Health Minister and 2017 candidate for Director at WHO, former Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations, reveals that in a recent 2020 Chattam House closed door meeting, both the editors of the Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine stated their concerns about the criminal pressures of BigPharma on their publications. May 2020
Over half of medical journal editors receive money from Pharma
Miscellany on Drug Companies
J&J plans to have trials on children